nanog mailing list archives

RE: Cisco HFR


From: Herman Harless <herman () ntelos net>
Date: 26 May 2004 15:06:53 -0400


On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:55, Williams, Jeff wrote:

Peter Galbavy wrote:
Today's Financial Times in the UK carried a mutli-page (1/3rd or so of 
each broadsheet page) series of ads for this platform.

Ergh, the worst fluffy "now you can do this" marketing I have seen in 
quite a while. When will they learn that "bigger, faster, harder" is 
difficult to PR...

Peter

Given the performance of this box isn't it a bit silly to mass market
advertise it?  At a guess there are only a few dozen companies worldwide
that might need such a machine- so why not go direct to them?  Or is this a
case of 'brand awareness'?  Is it really that important that the population
at large thinks that Cisco gear is at the core of the Internet?  Are
end-users supposed to call their ISP and demand they use Cisco 'cause they
saw a commercial for them?  Just curious... I like their gear, just not
their marketing.

Jeff

No, this for their stockholders/investors.  This type of advertising is
strictly for Wall Street, not for engineers.  

Herman


Current thread: