nanog mailing list archives

Re: ntp config tech note


From: John Kristoff <jtk () northwestern edu>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 06:12:27 -0500


On Thu, 20 May 2004 21:08:43 -0700
Michael Sinatra <michael () rancid berkeley edu> wrote:

I run two stratum-1 servers and a few stratum-2s and I provide time via 
multicast (224.0.0.1), but I don't use it for my servers, except for 

Presumably you meant 224.0.1.1.

testing and verification.  I am also providing anycast ntp, and, if the 
belt and suspenders weren't enough, I am experimenting with manycast. 

Noting that NTP uses more than a reply response message exchange.  No
concerns about session breakage?  SNTP would certainly be a very
viable candidate for anycast.

Except in the extreme case such as wisc.edu's unfortunate experience,
does multicast buy much?  Traffic loads for properly running clients
and distributed servers tend to be relatively low in my experience.

John


Current thread: