nanog mailing list archives

VZW + Outlook2003 + SMTPS? MTU? Proxy?


From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:07:46 +0000 (GMT)


Greetings,


Has anyone encountered

        Mar 17 14:24:01 mail postfix/smtpd[32452]: SSL_accept
        error from unknown[166.154.120.211]: -1

        Mar 17 14:24:01 mail postfix/smtpd[32452]: warning: Write
        failed in network_biopair_interop with errno=32:
        num_write=-1, provided=974

or similar using Outlook 2003 and SMTPS?  Outlook reports a
connection timeout, though Postfix obviously is seeing packets.
I'm trying to determine why Outlook thinks Postfix isn't there,
and why Postfix thinks the SSL negotiation was aborted.

The op content:  I'm asking in particular if any proxying[*], MTU
issues, or other network creativity is known on the VZW network.
PMTUd works on the Postfix end.

I don't have the VZW-connected machine handy ATM to test further.
SMTPS on that machine works correctly on non-VZW providers.  I
don't know about HTTPS, so I admittedly can't rule out PKI fun.

[*] Yes, I know it would be foolish and futile to try proxying
    TCP/465 at the app level.


Eddy
--
EverQuick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
_________________________________________________________________
          DO NOT send mail to the following addresses :
  blacklist () brics com -or- alfra () intc net -or- curbjmp () intc net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.


Current thread: