nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm
From: Scott Call <scall () devolution com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Has anyone figured out the collateral damage if 4000/udp were to be blocked for a couple of days? Since the exploit is in the ICQ code of ISS's products, does blocking 4000/udp block ICQ as well? Thanks -S -- Scott Call Router Geek, ATGi, home of $6.95 Prime Rib I make the world a better place, I boycott Wal-Mart VoIP incoming: +1 360-382-1814
Current thread:
- UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Johannes B. Ullrich (Mar 20)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Josh Richards (Mar 20)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Josh Richards (Mar 20)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm George Bakos (Mar 21)
- AW: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Florian Frotzler (Mar 22)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Josh Richards (Mar 20)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Scott Call (Mar 20)
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Josh Richards (Mar 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UDP port 4000 traffic: likely a new worm Rodney Joffe (Mar 20)