nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus Exposed
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:58:12 -0500
--On Thursday, March 18, 2004 8:12 AM -0800 Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:
Well, like any tool, it's not inherently evil, it just depends how it's used. And in all likelihood, if it's used with respect to England, in all likelihood it'll be used in moderation, since England has some political visibility of its own.
Hey Bill. Just so you know in the future, Cardiff is not in England.Now, even the HTML poster who mistakes nanog for spam-l is asking for this to be taken offlist... the *original* thread wasn't even on target, let alone where this is going :p
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed, (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Joshua Brady (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) William Warren (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Henry Linneweh (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Jason Slagle (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Bill Woodcock (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed John Payne (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Sam Stickland (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Jim Popovitch (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Tracing packets (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Andrew - Supernews (Mar 17)