nanog mailing list archives
Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed)
From: "Dave Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:02:22 -0000
Joshua Brady wrote:
The "Child" you speak of caused destruction over a network, the same applied for the 2 hackers here who were sent over without even questioning the UK. If the US Government is Satan then I suppose I am going to hell, because I sure as hell support it.
Oh, so do I - I just think on general principles it really should require a judge in the serving country to rubberstamp it before the snatch and grab takes place - or more appropriately that the case be made to a UK judge, the child tried here and sentenced here. His actions were, after all, a criminal offence here too....
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed, (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed up (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Joshua Brady (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Dave Howe (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) William Warren (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Henry Linneweh (Mar 18)
- Re: US Extradition rights (was Re: Spamhaus Exposed) Jason Slagle (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Bill Woodcock (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed John Payne (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Peter Galbavy (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Sam Stickland (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Paul Jakma (Mar 18)
- Re: Spamhaus Exposed Jim Popovitch (Mar 18)