nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 21:48:55 -0500
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:48:37 EST, Joshua Brady <jbrady () neoins com> said:
Even if he is, what you did and said was slanderous, beyond a normal NANOG flamewar.
Oh please do Susan what he did was already illegal.
Contrary to the list charter, quite probably. Illegal? Unclear. It's bordering on the whole slander/libel thing, but in general, truth is an absolute defense against a slander or libel charge. What the actual truth of the matter is, I neither know, nor have any real desire to investigate.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Gregory Taylor (Mar 13)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 14)
- Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Joshua Brady (Mar 14)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Joshua Brady (Mar 14)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Gregory Taylor (Mar 14)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Matthew S. Hallacy (Mar 14)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Charles Sprickman (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Matthew S. Hallacy (Mar 14)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG John Harold (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Brian Bruns (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG ren (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG james (Mar 15)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 15)