nanog mailing list archives
Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:38:01 +0200
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
But the decision is a business decision, because you can make "businesses" pay more for something that can run servers. And it´s harder to kludge smtp/http/etc. to work where servers are not permitted as p2p works by default.how are 'servers' (smtp/web/ftp/imap) different than the existing P2P apps? Wouldn't a cable provider, if the decision was based on upstream bandwidth sharing alone, care MORE about P2P than 'servers' ?
Pete
Current thread:
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?, (continued)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Andrew Dorsett (Mar 15)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Curtis Maurand (Mar 16)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Curtis Maurand (Mar 16)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Mar 16)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Scott McGrath (Mar 16)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Eric Gauthier (Mar 16)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? John Kristoff (Mar 16)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Andrew Dorsett (Mar 13)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Stephen Sprunk (Mar 13)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Petri Helenius (Mar 14)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Stephen Sprunk (Mar 14)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Brian Bruns (Mar 14)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Vivien M. (Mar 14)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Brian Bruns (Mar 14)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Tim Wilde (Mar 14)
- RE: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Todd Vierling (Mar 14)
- Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo? Janet Sullivan (Mar 15)