nanog mailing list archives
Re: Overflow circuit
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:33:29 -0500
In message <05f001c41474$f8ae7080$6401a8c0@alexh>, "Alexei Roudnev" writes:
It means, that satellite (with it's 1 second delay and unavoidable echo) should be better accepted for _profeccionsl_ phone connection (such as, for example, connection between remote oil wells and central office), because you can always stay with delay, if follow some talking discippline (and it is better than trunking radio, anyway), while it will be less acceptable for home / residential users. Delay (by itself) does not influence voice quaility, but it required strick talking discipline / policy to avoid misunderstanding, echo and so on. We can expect such discipline from professional workers, but you never expect it from your 5 y.old kid.
Fair enough. I should add one more thing: with that sort of delay, you need good echo cancellers. If you're getting echo, they're not good enough, I suspect... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- RE: Overflow circuit, (continued)
- RE: Overflow circuit Mailing List Subscriptions (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Stephen Sprunk (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Joe Chin (Mar 28)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Joe Chin (Mar 28)
- RE: Overflow circuit Michel Py (Mar 26)
- Re: Overflow circuit W.D.McKinney (Mar 27)
- RE: Overflow circuit Michel Py (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 27)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)
- RE: Overflow circuit Mailing List Subscriptions (Mar 28)
- Re: Overflow circuit Alexei Roudnev (Mar 27)