nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Chris Yarnell <cdy () kooks net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
For that matter why don't they just name entire NANOG! I remember what a reaction there was on the list and 100% of those responding were purely negative of Verisign wildcards.
Hmm, I remember a whole lot of really irrational and really unhelpful replies. Granted, there were some well thought out replies sprinkled in there, but I dunno if I want to be grouped with all of the other posters. :-)
Current thread:
- Verisign vs. ICANN Bob Martin (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jeff Shultz (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Ariel Biener (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN william(at)elan.net (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Chris Yarnell (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN william(at)elan.net (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jeff Shultz (Jun 17)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)