nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verisign vs. ICANN


From: "Jeff Shultz" <jeffshultz () wvi com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:10:57 -0700


I'm having fun figuring out how altering BIND (since I assume that is
the basis of their arguements) rises to the level of conspiracy... 
IANAL, obviously. 

** Reply to message from Bob Martin <bob () buckhorn net> on Thu, 17 Jun
2004 16:54:20 -0500

Anything I/we can do to help the cause?

Bob Martin

Quoted from different thread:


(note that verisign has amended their complaint against icann (since the
court dismissed the first one) and i'm now named as a co-conspirator.  if
you reply to this message, there's a good chance of your e-mail appearing
in court filings at some point.)
-- Paul Vixie

-- 
Jeff Shultz
A railfan pulls up to a RR crossing hoping that
there will be a train. 


Current thread: