nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP list of phishing sites?
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:43:59 +0100
None of this would be an issue, if abuse desks were: 1. Responsive 2. Responsible 3. Empowered 4. Accountable Today, they are none of the above.
A lot of people on this list are opposed to increasing government regulation of the Internet industry. But how would you feel about a law which required all network operators to have an abuse department which is responsive, responsible, empowered and accountable? Now that is an area where the FCC and CRTC and Ofcom and the ACA could probably do some good for the industry. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites?, (continued)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? David Barak (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? David Barak (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Michael . Dillon (Jun 29)
- RE: BGP list of phishing sites? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Simon Lockhart (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 29)