nanog mailing list archives
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 01:19:08 +0100 (IST)
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
do with it, even to the point of rejecting routes within 240.0.0.0/4 when they come in over BGP. (Which an MacOSX box running Zebra will happily provide.)Class D you mean surely?
sigh, i cant read, you did mean class E ;) regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam () dishone st Fortune: "Die? I should say not, dear fellow. No Barrymore would allow such a conventional thing to happen to him." -- John Barrymore's dying words
Current thread:
- The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Peter Corlett (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Tony Li (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jon Lewis (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Peter Corlett (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul Jakma (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul Jakma (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jon Lewis (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jon Lewis (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. william(at)elan.net (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Howard C. Berkowitz (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. sthaug (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Petri Helenius (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen Sprunk (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Chris Ranch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)