nanog mailing list archives
Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:34:39 +0300
sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
It's kind of stupid when you have to tell fellow workers trying to get a certification "This isn't real life, you just have to learn it for the exam. In real life we use CIDR."
You donĀ“t have to take the CCNA stuff if you go for CCIE directly. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses., (continued)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul Jakma (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul Jakma (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jon Lewis (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jared Mauch (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. william(at)elan.net (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Howard C. Berkowitz (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. sthaug (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Petri Helenius (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen Sprunk (Jun 27)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Jonathan McDowell (Jun 27)
- RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Tony Hain (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Bob Snyder (Jun 28)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 26)
- Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses. Paul G (Jun 26)