Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?

["Ricardo \"Rick\" Gonzalez" <rico.gonzalez () gmail com>]

JD,

Nice work.  Good to hear Hotmail is doing their fair share to be a
responsible member of the community by adapting SPF.  Does this mean
that other improvements, such as not defaulting to sending HTML-tagged
e-mail with a 10-column line wrap, aren't far behind? =)

---Rico

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:17 -0700, J.D. Falk <jdfalk () cybernothing org> wrote:
> On 07/26/04, Gerald <gcoon () inch com> wrote:
>
> > > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
> >
> > Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use,
> > but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet?
>
>         From that article: 'Sender ID is a proposed technology standard,
>         backed by Microsoft, for verifying an e-mail message's source. It
>         combines two previous standards: the Microsoft-developed "Caller
>         ID," and the Meng Weng Wong-developed SPF.'
>
>         Here's Hotmail's Caller ID record:
>
> _ep.hotmail.com text = "<ep xmlns='http://ms.net/1&apos; 
> testing='true'><out><m><indirect>list1._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list2._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list3._ep.hotmail.com</indirect></m></out></ep>"
>
>         http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid.mspx
>
> --
> J.D. Falk                            "...one of the worst signs of our danger
> <jdfalk () cybernothing org>                       is we can't imagine the route
>                                                           from here to utopia."
>                                                     -- Kim Stanley Robinson