nanog mailing list archives
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
From: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor () inoc net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:55:02 -0400
J.D. Falk wrote:
OK... Aug 1 is a weekish away. Check your inbound mail for today, and ask yourself how much you'd be losing if you started enforcing SPF today, and what percentage of the sites you get legitimate mail from are likely to deploy SPF tags this week.....I'd be extremely surprised if anyone were planning to block all mail from non-SPF-using sites any time soon. However, it'll still be useful as an additional data point in a filtering decision process.
Good point, and nobody would receive the NANOG mailing list... ;-)Received-SPF: none (Cache: No spf record for (merit.edu) ) client-ip=198.108.1.26; envelope-from=<owner-nanog () merit edu>;
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) -- Robert Blayzor INOC, LLC rblayzor () inoc net
Current thread:
- SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Jared Mauch (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Joel Jaeggli (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? John Bittenbender (Jul 24)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Gerald (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Petri Helenius (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Stephen Stuart (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Edward B. Dreger (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Robert Blayzor (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Mike Leber (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Douglas Otis (Jul 27)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? J.D. Falk (Jul 26)
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Ricardo "Rick" Gonzalez (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ? Douglas Otis (Jul 27)