nanog mailing list archives

Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]

From: vijay gill <vgill () vijaygill com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 18:02:03 +0000


On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:55:42AM -0700, joe mcguckin wrote:


$5000 for an ethernet switch port? It makes me long for the days of throwing
ethernet cables over the ceiling to informally peer with other networks in a



Throwing ethernet cables over the ceiling does not scale.

/vijay

Current thread:

RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?], (continued)
- RE: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 03)
- Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 03)
  - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Troy Davis (Jul 03)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Randy Bush (Jul 03)
  - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Bill Woodcock (Jul 04)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Steve Gibbard (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points Niels Bakker (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] joe mcguckin (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Patrick W Gilmore (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Tony Li (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Patrick W Gilmore (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Michael . Dillon (Jul 06)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Paul Vixie (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Paul Vixie (Jul 05)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Michael . Dillon (Jul 06)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] Leo Bicknell (Jul 06)
    - Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?] vijay gill (Jul 06)

(Thread continues...)