nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 23:21:01 +0200 (IST)
## On 2004-01-20 20:02 -0800 Tom (UnitedLayer) typed: T(> T(> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: T(> > Not all L3-switches are flow-based; prefix-based ones should do just fine. T(> > Can people add/correct this initial list ? T(> > T(> > Flow-based: Foundry with IronCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500 with Sup1(A) T(> > Prefix-based: Foundry with JetCore modules, Cisco Catalyst 6500/7600 with T(> > Sup2(A), Sup3(A/BXL) T(> T(> The 2948G-L3 and the 4908G-L3 I believe are Prefix/ASIC based. T(> I believe the 3550-EMI is as well, but I'm not familiar with that T(> equipment. T(> T(> Anyone know about the: Cisco Catalyst 3750 ? Nortel Passport 8600/1600 ? As for the 3550-EMI "real life" experience as a 10/100 BT aggregation switch wasn't affected(CPU <5%) at all by rather aggressive scanning but did generate around 11 Mb/sec of ARP requests on all the 100Mb/sec ports in the same VLAN and totally killed connectivity to legacy equipment connected at 10 Mb/s ... -- Thanks! Rafi
Current thread:
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath, (continued)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Donovan Hill (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Tom (UnitedLayer) (Jan 20)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath John Lyons (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath sthaug (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 21)
- Re: Nachi/Welchia Aftermath Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 21)