nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24s run amuck
From: Frank Louwers <frank () openminds be>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:18:39 +0100
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:12:13PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Answer: You don't. This is the type of deaggregation which is a "necessary evil". And, IMHO, why filtering on /20 (or whatever) is a Bad Thing. You have just as much right to multiple upstreams as the
Filtering on a /20 or whatever (up to /24) is a bad thing because RIPE (and maybe APNIC) actually gives out /24 PI space, that comes out of RIPE's /8's, not your upstream's /20 or /16 or /whatever... Kind Regards, Frank Louwers - on a /24 PI space... -- Openminds bvba www.openminds.be Tweebruggenstraat 16 - 9000 Gent - Belgium
Current thread:
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 13)
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 17)
- Re: /24s run amuck Daniel Golding (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Daniel Senie (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck John Payne (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steve Francis (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Frank Louwers (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Simon Leinen (Jan 15)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)