nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:
From: "Brian Bruns" <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:25:45 -0500
On Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:21 PM [EST], Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> wrote:
Doesn't sitefinder give one registry superior access to the registry's resources than the others, etc, etc?
It gives Verisign/NetSol the ability to generate exclusive profit from the hijacking of every non-existant domain name in existance. No other registar could do something like this without paying for every last domain they take, or could they ever do anything like this due to the fact that Verisign/NetSol controls ALL of the TLD servers for .com and .net. -- Brian Brunsk The Summit Open Source Development Group Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources http://www.sosdg.org The Abusive Hosts Blocking List http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- ICANN/Registry Agreement: Deepak Jain (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Brian Bruns (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: David Barak (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Brian Bruns (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement: Brian Bruns (Feb 26)