nanog mailing list archives
Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 25 Feb 2004 19:06:03 +0000
jared () puck nether net (Jared Mauch) writes:
... I keep hear of Frame-Relay and ATM signaling that is going to happen in large providers MPLS cores. That's right, your "safe" TDM based services, will be transported over someones IP backbone first.
One of my DS3/DS1 vendors recently told me of a plan to use MPLS for part of the route inside their switching center. I said "not with my circuits you won't". Once they understood that I was willing to take my business elsewhere or simply do without, they decided that an M13 was worth having after all. My advice is, walk softly but carry a big stick. When we all say "everything over IP" that means teaching more devices how to speak 802.11 or other packet-based access protocols rather than giving them ATM or F/R or dialup modem circuitry. It does *not* mean simulating an ISO-L1 or ISO-L2 "circuit" using a ISO-L3 "network". (Ick.) -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage), (continued)
- RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Erik Haagsman (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) David Meyer (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jared Mauch (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Petri Helenius (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Jeff S Wheeler (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Feb 25)
- Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 Outage) Matthew Crocker (Feb 25)
- RE: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat) Bora Akyol (Feb 25)
- Expectations or It can't happen to me (was Re: How Reliable) Sean Donelan (Feb 26)