nanog mailing list archives
Re: 168.0.0.0/6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:50 +0800
I have previously contacted Swisscom about it back in 9/2003 and received the following response:we are filtering on RIR minimal allocation boundaries. This creates some routing holes which we fill by these semi-default routes (towards our upstreams) for our customers' perusal.
luckily, things like this are never leaked into the open internet by multi-homed customers and weak filtering policies. </sarcasm> randy
Current thread:
- 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Joe Provo (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Joe Provo (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Andre Chapuis (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 william(at)elan.net (Feb 24)
- RE: 168.0.0.0/6 Jeroen Massar (Feb 24)
- Re: 168.0.0.0/6 Randy Bush (Feb 24)