nanog mailing list archives

Re: 168.0.0.0/6


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:39:10 +0800


Isn't that something to notify AS3303 aka SWISSCOM about rather
than NANOG?

perhaps because this path has been taken in the past and failed?

Especially since it does not look like it is spreading very
widely.

hard to tell, isn't it.  and hard to say the effect on the places
to which it has spread.

randy


Current thread: