nanog mailing list archives

RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks


From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:37:45 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Michel Py wrote:

Good idea, no contest. Now, the devil's advocate asks: what makes you
think that operators/ISPs are going to react faster to your pilot stuff
being bogonized than they would to real traffic being bogonized, as if
it's a pilot project it's by definition not urgent and can wait
tomorrow?

Although I salute the effort, I am concerned that this will not change
current reactive behavior which is to wait for the shit to hit the fan
to update bogon lists. Might sound sad, but I think the way to

Assuming the pilot program does some form of reachability testing and then 
some effort is made to notify those with bad filters (good luck), then at 
least this notifies them before it's a real inconvenience for anyone.  
They may or may not choose to react, but at least this puts them on notice 
that they have a problem that will be real in the near future.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*|  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


Current thread: