nanog mailing list archives
RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:29:04 -0800
Daniel, [me puts the Devil's advocate suit on] If I read this correctly, the way I summarize it is: "Instead of waiting for people that get real delegations in a newly allocated /8 to have real problems, we delegate parts of this new /8 to pilot projects before hand, knowing that there will be issues, which allows us to contact operators that are still bogonizing the new block. The idea being that the inconvenience caused by a pilot project being bogonized is of little consequence where the inconvenience of a real delegation being bogonized is real." Good idea, no contest. Now, the devil's advocate asks: what makes you think that operators/ISPs are going to react faster to your pilot stuff being bogonized than they would to real traffic being bogonized, as if it's a pilot project it's by definition not urgent and can wait tomorrow? Although I salute the effort, I am concerned that this will not change current reactive behavior which is to wait for the shit to hit the fan to update bogon lists. Might sound sad, but I think the way to de-bogonize new blocks is to automate the de-bogonization process, as the idea to de-bogonize ahead of time will not cut it as a priority, IMHO. My $0.02, and let me stress that I did not intend to sound negative as the idea is good; I'm just a little skeptical. Michel.
Current thread:
- Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Daniel Karrenberg (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks Michel Py (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks jlewis (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks william(at)elan.net (Feb 24)
- RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address Blocks jlewis (Feb 24)