nanog mailing list archives

Re: Anycast and windows servers


From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:38:51 -0500


At 05:43 AM 2/20/2004, you wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
> Honestly, I do not know about OSPF (or BGP) on Windows, however, you
> can just static route to the Windows box(es).  Sure, if the OS hangs,
> the interface will stay up and the static route will still push bits at
> the dead box, but it will work (FSVO "work").
>
> Besides, how often does Windows crash? <snicker>

Hence the reason why I want the route to cease being advertised if the box
"fails."

Connect the server(s) to APC MasterSwitch or equivalent hardware. Monitor the server box(es) for responsiveness. If/when it fails, the monitoring station can instruct the MasterSwitch to reboot (power cycle, really) the box. Stuff is pretty inexpensive (certainly less so than load balancers).


I'm trying to avoid putting yet another server load balancer box in front
of the windows box to withdraw the route so a different "working" box will
be closest.  It may be an oxymoron, but I'm trying to make the windows
service (if not a particular windows box) as "reliable" as possible
without introducing more boxes than necessary.

My initial thought last night was in fact the use of load balancers. But then you need to think about redundant load balancers and so on.

Current thread: