Re: Anycast and windows servers

[Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>]

Sean,

> Hence the reason why I want the route to cease being advertised if the box
> "fails."
>
> I'm trying to avoid putting yet another server load balancer box in front
> of the windows box to withdraw the route so a different "working" box will
> be closest.  It may be an oxymoron, but I'm trying to make the windows
> service (if not a particular windows box) as "reliable" as possible
> without introducing more boxes than necessary.

You might be better not running the routing protocol on the Windows box,
and run gated (or whatever) on some nearby Linux/BSD box which tests the
availability of each of your windows box and introduces the appropriate
route (i.e. a next-hop for the anycast address pointing at a normal IP
address) into (a very local) BGP (running multipath) or other favorite
routing protocol for each of the servers that are up.

Alex