nanog mailing list archives

RE: Anti-spam System Idea


From: "Timothy R. McKee" <tim () baseworx net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:19:03 -0500


Personally I don't see where ingress filters that only allow registered 
SMTP servers to initiate TCP connections on port 25 is irresponsible.

Any user sophisticated enough to legitimately require a running SMTP server 
should also have the sophistication to create a dns entry and register it
with
his upstream in whatever manner is required.
 
There will never be a painless or easy solution to this problem, only a 
choice where we select the lesser of all evils.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete () he iki fi] 
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 16:06
To: Timothy R. McKee
Cc: 'J Bacher'; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Anti-spam System Idea

Timothy R. McKee wrote:

There will *never* be a concerted action by all service providers to 
filter ingress/egress on abused ports unless there is a legal 
requirement to do so.  Think 'level playing field'...
 

HavenĀ“t it been stated enough times previously that blindly blocking ports
is irresponsible?

There are ways to similar, if not more accurate results without resorting to
shooting everything that moves.

Pete


Current thread: