nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-spam System Idea
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:06:15 +0200
Timothy R. McKee wrote:
There will *never* be a concerted action by all service providers to filter ingress/egress on abused ports unless there is a legal requirementHavenĀ“t it been stated enough times previously that blindly blocking ports is irresponsible?to do so. Think 'level playing field'...
There are ways to similar, if not more accurate results without resorting to shooting everything that moves.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea, (continued)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Identifying IP address types Sean Donelan (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Feb 16)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 16)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea J Bacher (Feb 16)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Timothy R. McKee (Feb 16)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Petri Helenius (Feb 16)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Timothy R. McKee (Feb 16)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Scott McGrath (Feb 17)
- Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 17)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (Feb 17)
- RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Don Gould (Feb 17)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 17)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea) Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 17)