nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anti-spam System Idea
From: Steven Champeon <schampeo () hesketh com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:16:42 -0500
on Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:55:40PM -0800, Tim Thorpe wrote:
If these exist then why are we still having problems?
See my reply to the thread "SMTP relaying policies for Commercial ISP customers...?" -- we have problems because the spammers are a lot smarter than any of us and can bounce from one infected host to another, in an attempt to evade network-specific traps, and few ISPs do anything at all to stop them.
Why do we let customers who have been infected flood the networks with traffic as they do?
Very good question.
Should they not also be responsible for the security of their computers? Do we not do enough to educate?
Yes, and no. -- hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier
Current thread:
- Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea william(at)elan.net (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Michael Wiacek (Feb 14)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Andy Dills (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea jlewis (Feb 14)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Steven Champeon (Feb 14)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea jlewis (Feb 14)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea william(at)elan.net (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea jlewis (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Jon R. Kibler (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Daniel Reed (Feb 16)
- RE: Anti-spam System Idea Tim Thorpe (Feb 14)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Sean Donelan (Feb 15)
- Re: Anti-spam System Idea Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)