nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: 02 Feb 2004 13:35:30 -0500
"The Gunn" <webmaster () jessicastover com> writes:
And in response to Rob's suggestion to use SSL instead of implementing cache-control, it would be a pretty wasteful implementation of SSL if its purpose is solely to prevent a proxy from recompressing your images.
To clarify (for list readers who are out of the loop because I made the point in a private communication) I suggested use of SSL in the cited hypothetical case of "for example, high-res medical x-rays and other confidential information, consumer purchased high-res images and other copyrighted information purchased by the end user". Given the HIPAA and e-commerce implications of the two named cases, using SSL would seem to be a no-brainer, and effectively renders the issue of cache-control moot. I also suggested that "The Gunn" read http://www.nanog.org/aup.html item #7 and begin posting with an account that has a real name on it. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown Brian Bruns (Feb 01)
- Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown The Gunn (Feb 02)
- Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 02)
- Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup seems to be a slowdown The Gunn (Feb 02)