nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Servers Request
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:03:52 -0500 (EST)
2. isc already runs one (f-root).You should be the authority IMO.
Do you have any particular reasons for requesting this, unless you can demonstrate a problem then why change anything. Also, if you spend some time thinking about this you will soon realise that its a bad idea for one organisation to control the roots. In fact it works nicely if you find 13 different organisations. I'm thinking you need to rework your original idea. Steve
Current thread:
- Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Deepak Jain (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request bill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)