nanog mailing list archives
Re: Root Servers Request
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 10 Feb 2004 04:32:23 +0000
lists () lazyeyez net (Donovan Hill) writes:
thanks for your vote of confidence. here are some facts you should know: 1. there are 13 root servers, not one.gah! I did mean plural.
in that case i disagree. no single entity should control all of the servers.
2. isc already runs one (f-root).You should be the authority IMO.
i think the selection of the authority needs to be made by a wider audience. for example, by some assembly of icann. the community of interest in root name service is world wide, not north american.
3. icann doesn't formally read nanog.Yeah. I think I'll send a letter.
or go to the next icann meeting in rome. or both. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Deepak Jain (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request bill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Todd Vierling (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Paul Vixie (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Root Servers Request Donovan Hill (Feb 09)
- Re: Root Servers Request Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 09)