nanog mailing list archives
Re: question on ptr rr
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:36:42 -0500
In message <g38yjeu4vk.fsf () sa vix com>, Paul Vixie writes:
I think the tipping point went by a while ago, and that anyone who wants their e-mail to be accepted will make sure their mail relay has a PTR and that that this PTR holds the same name used in the SMTP HELO command.
Of course, not all that long ago AT&T Worldnet got crucified -- on this list, among other places -- for doing just that. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: question on ptr rr, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 10)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: question on ptr rr Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 10)
- Re: question on ptr rr Randy Bush (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Sean Donelan (Feb 07)
- Re: question on ptr rr Paul Vixie (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr garrett.allen (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Chris Adams (Feb 08)
- Re: question on ptr rr Andrew - Supernews (Feb 08)