nanog mailing list archives

RE: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses


From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:24:56 +0000


And why 4470 for POS?  Did everyone borrow a vendor's FDDI-like default
or is there a technical reason?  PPP seems able to use 64k packets (as
can the frame-based version of GFP, incidentally, POS's likely
replacement). 
 
According to this URL 
http://www.columbia.edu/acis/networks/advanced/jumbo/jumbo.html
which you have seen before, the number of CRC bits in the protocol
header limits the number of bytes you can practically use for the
MTU. I expect that we won't go beyond 9000 byte MTUs for a long
time.

The 4470 for POS probably comes from Token Ring originally. In the
original 4 Mbps token ring a device was allowed to hold the token
for 9.1 ms which was enough time to transmit 4550 octets. This timing
was probably adopted by FDDI which borrowed a lot from the token
ring design. No doubt, the designers of POS were also influenced by
token ring and just chose the same size.

--Michael Dillon



Current thread: