nanog mailing list archives

Re: no whois info ?


From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:12:46 +0000


Rich,

<registrar_hat_current="on">
  <epp_coauthor_hat="on">
    <registry_hat_expired="on">

        You have an opinion, but I'm unable to detect a basis for that
        opinion.

        Allocations of string-space do not give rise to control over any
        resource other than (conditionally) the string.

        Publication of association(s) between strings and addresses, as
        well as the formation of an association subject to a publication
        policy, involves zero or more parties other than a "registrant",
        and there are several orders of magnitude fewer entities other
        than "registrants" that participate in address association and
        association publication.

    </registrar_hat_current>
  </epp_coauthor_hat>
</registry_hat_expired>

<p3p_spec_coauthor_hat="on">

  It wouldn't hurt you to read our spec, if only for the nomenclature.
  If you read some EU data directives, so much the better.
  
</p3p_spec_coauthor_ha>

<nanog_er_weenie_hat="on">

  You may want to look at the whois policies of the RIRs and some of the
  ccTLD operators. 

</nanog_er_weenie_hat>

<ietf_whoisfix_bof_cochair="on">

  See also http://www.imc.org/ietf-whois/mail-archive/msg00218.html
  and rfc3912

</ietf_whoisfix_bof_cochair="on">

Eric


Current thread: