nanog mailing list archives

Re: Peering best practices advice needed.


From: David Gethings <davidg () pipex net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:15:09 +0000


On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 17:03 +0000, Rolo Tomassi wrote:
Hi all,

Please forgive the simplistic nature of the query..

Basically my company is multi-homed with 2 different providers in the UK, 
and advertising a /18. Now some colleaguges in another part of the world 
want to break that /18 into two /19's and advertise one /19 and we advertise 
the other. This is fine, however we are NOT running IBGP in the core, 
therefore the UK customers in the /19 will not be able to reach the other 
/19 as there would be a loop detected through EBGP.

Now someone mentioned that we could use AS-LOOP-IN feature which will 
overcome this problem and allow us to route to each other via EBGP. I really 
think this is a bad idea but until we get an internal link - I dont see a 
way forward. So... anyone doing this currently in their network or have any 
"best practices" way round this. I want our company to be good Netizens but 
still be able to pass traffic between the 2 /19's.
Well another way for solve this problem is that both parts advertise
their /19. From the transit provider take your normal routing table and
a default route. The default route allows the two /19's to reach each
other over the transit provider(s).

-- 
Cheers

Dg


Current thread: