nanog mailing list archives
Re: XO Mail engineers?
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:30:42 -0400
At 03:23 PM 8/4/2004, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Drew Weaver wrote: > It is generally the responsibility of the ISP to provide the outgoing > mail transport for your connected users. This BCP seems to be changing. The new BCP which seems to be evolving requires customers to authenticate to their home mail server on the MSA port and send mail that way. This appears to be being driven by SPF/Sender-ID-like mechanisms.
It is also driven by common sense. Using Submission with AUTH permits users to configure their email service once on their laptops, and use it from wherever they roam. Let's face it, the present crop of mail client software does not make it easy to quickly change outgoing servers, but all popular current mail clients support SMTP AUTH, and to at least some degree (i.e. with some coaching of the end user) support Submission port (587).
Let's encourage this. It's good for users. It's good for help desks.
Current thread:
- XO Mail engineers? Drew Weaver (Aug 04)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Forrest W. Christian (Aug 04)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Daniel Senie (Aug 04)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? David A . Ulevitch (Aug 04)
- SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Edward B. Dreger (Aug 04)
- RE: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Douglas Otis (Aug 04)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) David A . Ulevitch (Aug 04)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Edward B. Dreger (Aug 04)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Crist Clark (Aug 04)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Pekka Savola (Aug 04)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Dave Crocker (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Edward B. Dreger (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 09)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Forrest W. Christian (Aug 04)