nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 16 Aug 2004 20:13:32 +0000
patrick () ianai net (Patrick W Gilmore) writes:
PS: I will patent it myself to prevent Versign from doing this.And if they do, what's to stop the root operators from doing this.
the root server operators don't act collectively.
Remember, there are 13 IPs no one can get around - no other "TLD" to register your domain name.
according to the whackos, we are the "legacy root" operators, and folks ought to feel free to point their resolvers at any of the "alternative root" operators instead. YMMV.
Flipped on its head, what's to stop the root operators from circumventing anything Verisign or any other TLD operator does?
root server operators don't control the root zone, they only publish it. some combination of itu (via the iso3166 process), icann/iana, ietf/iab, and us-DoC are the folks you'd go to if you wanted a toplevel wildcard. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Wouters (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Loftis (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Andre Oppermann (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Loftis (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Wouters (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Aug 16)