nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 16 Aug 2004 19:12:44 +0000
mloftis () wgops com (Michael Loftis) writes:
... The BIND source was modified in response to CUSTOMERS REQUESTS. ...
actually, it was multiple credible threats of codeforking that got this done. (as i explained in the press at that time, "isc cherishes our relevance.") -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Wouters (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Loftis (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Andre Oppermann (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Loftis (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN bmanning (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Wouters (Aug 16)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Aug 16)