nanog mailing list archives
Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now"
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:30:53 -0700
Folks,
There is a proposal that should interest you. It is called Bounce Tag Address Validation By Dave Crocker. http://www.brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-marid-batv-00-06dc.html This proposal is now in the IETF MASS WG.
TH> There was a BoF called MASS held at the recent IETF meetings in San Diego; TH> it has not yet been approved as a working group and no charter has been TH> reviewed by the IESG. While I believe the work on BATV is interesting, TH> I am not sure gating it on the approval of MASS is a good idea. and boy oh boy do i agree with you! however, the description of BATV as a "proposal" is a non-trivial point. The document outlines ideas but there is not yet a serious, detailed specification. (it is almost complete, of course, but that never counts until it is released.) At any rate, it will be entirely possible to use the 'private' mode of BATV privately, without requiring or expecting broad implementation. d/ ps. my original posting was not an indirect attempt to promote any specification i am working on. it was merely a direct attempt to encourage folks to consider the strategic issues more. -- Dave Crocker <dcrocker-at-brandenburg-dot-com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <www.brandenburg.com> Sunnyvale, CA USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>
Current thread:
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?), (continued)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Dave Crocker (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Edward B. Dreger (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Dave Crocker (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Scott Francis (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Ted Hardie (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Message not available
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Dave Crocker (Aug 13)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Edward B. Dreger (Aug 12)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 04)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Douglas Otis (Aug 05)