nanog mailing list archives
Re: XO Mail engineers?
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis () mail-abuse org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
David A.Ulevitch wrote:1: SRS may just be a boondoggle, we'll see.Considering MARID seems to be sender id first and the rest nowhere .. http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3390221
This article has the state of these drafts stated incorrectly. See: http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/msg03062.html There is a last call coming but there is no assurance Sender-ID will escape this process. Judging by remaining flaws, I doubt that it will. CSV will go to last call in October. I think its prospects are better. There are also work ongoing in MASS such as BATV. See: http://www.ietf.org/ietf/04aug/mass.txt This agenda has been amended to include BATV. http://www.brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-marid-batv-00-06dc.html It will be a draft written by Dave Crocker, John Levine, Sam Silberman, and Tony Finch. This will stop the bounces and virus notices without any help from the far end. I would also expect the Submitter draft in Sender-ID to be dropped. -Doug
Current thread:
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?), (continued)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: SPF again (Re: XO Mail engineers?) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Dave Crocker (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Scott Francis (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Ted Hardie (Aug 12)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Message not available
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Dave Crocker (Aug 13)
- Re: isn't "...isn't perfect, but it's something now" Edward B. Dreger (Aug 12)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 04)
- Re: XO Mail engineers? Douglas Otis (Aug 05)