Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> > Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not
> > attractive
> > at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100
> > years
> > is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on 
> > things
> > like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem,
> > the
> > cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing
> > number
> > of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me
> > almost everywhere at least).
>
> No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks
> have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the
> various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The
> discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do
> encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that
> discussion!

As was pointed out to me, I forgot to say how to subscribe :

http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIYY96arNKXTPFCVEQL6QACfURBnmYcuW3AKkK9iZv5cKGGpg8wAn2r9
iqUyPzs6GC7qwj/TDr8Ku7E0
=3n0f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----