Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


As co-chair of the multi6 WG :

On 2004-04-19, at 02.29, william(at)elan.net wrote:

> Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not 
> attractive
> at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100 
> years
> is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on things
> like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem, 
> the
> cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing 
> number
> of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me
> almost everywhere at least).

No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks 
have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the 
various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The 
discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do 
encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that 
discussion!

Best regards,

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIWIs6arNKXTPFCVEQLU/wCdFxVLrTswwUL5GQgei+sfuYTJPfwAoNzw
o1GimcbzYp72ngq16PI44Jws
=+GuV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----