nanog mailing list archives

Re: Lazy network operators

From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:40:08 +0200


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-04-18, at 04.48, Paul Jakma wrote:

Well, let's be honest, name one good reason why you'd want IPv6
(given you have 4)?


That's quite an assumption there.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIJbC6arNKXTPFCVEQLxIwCdGvTFXkzN/0EcNn5yGFkS5Q/UMnAAnRpW
p2XI44odXbqI1eN9A8RqcjTw
=bbPZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread:

Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- - - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 18)
    - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 19)
    - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Carlos Friacas (Apr 19)
    - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 18)
    - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators haesu (Apr 18)
    - Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators Paul Jakma (Apr 18)
    - RE: Lazy network operators Alex Bligh (Apr 18)
    - Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 18)
    - Re: Lazy network operators Randy Bush (Apr 19)
    - Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 25)
    - Re: Lazy network operators Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Apr 20)