Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators

[Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>]

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> Sure. But I do find myself saying "if we were doing IPv6 right now
> we wouldn't have this problem" more and more.

Which problem is that? ;)

(and if it involves NAT... sorry, no.)
 
> See http://countipv6.bgpexpert.com/. The different numbers under
> "site" represent different web pages. 8 is a fairly standard one,
> and it gets around 0.15% visits from people who are v6-capable.

And are these sites in any way related to IPv6 or networking? (news 
at 11, Web sites about IPv6 get less than 1% v6 traffic ;) )

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma      paul () clubi ie        paul () jakma org       Key ID: 64A2FF6A
        warning: do not ever send email to spam () dishone st
Fortune:
If your happiness depends on what somebody else does, I guess you do
have a problem.
                -- Richard Bach, "Illusions"