nanog mailing list archives
Re: TCP vulnerability
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart () tech org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:17:50 -0700
I suggest an extensive late-night BOF in San Francisco in the bar to discuss the mechanics of adding MD5 keys to all your sessions in 48 hours. Evidence of RSI and eyesight failure will be mandatoryfor those who prefer to be keyboard monkeys all their lives instead of building tools to configure and manage networks
Tools were used, some built specifically to minimize the RSI and eyestrain impact of this last round of config changes. Not the tools that one gets to build and use when one has the resources of a tier-1 provider at one's disposal (one set in particular I hear it quite excellent, and I wish it would be made available to the community), but it was by no means a tools-free effort on Joe's part. Stephen
Current thread:
- TCP vulnerability Grant A. Kirkwood (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Aviva Garrett (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Randy Bush (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Stephen Stuart (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Tom (UnitedLayer) (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Aviva Garrett (Apr 20)
- Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 20)
- Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Sean Donelan (Apr 20)
- Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Mike Tancsa (Apr 20)
- Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think David Luyer (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think Rob Thomas (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think Joe Abley (Apr 20)
- RE: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think David Luyer (Apr 20)