nanog mailing list archives

Re: TCP vulnerability

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:37:00 +0200

I suggest an extensive late-night BOF in San Francisco in the bar to 
discuss the mechanics of adding MD5 keys to all your sessions in 48 
hours. Evidence of RSI and eyesight failure will be mandatory


for those who prefer to be keyboard monkeys all their lives instead
of building tools to configure and manage networks

randy

Current thread:

TCP vulnerability Grant A. Kirkwood (Apr 20)
- Re: TCP vulnerability Aviva Garrett (Apr 20)
  - Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Randy Bush (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Joe Abley (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Stephen Stuart (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP vulnerability Tom (UnitedLayer) (Apr 20)
- Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 20)
  - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Sean Donelan (Apr 20)
  - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Mike Tancsa (Apr 20)
    - Re: Massive stupidity (Was: Re: TCP vulnerability) Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think David Luyer (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think Patrick W . Gilmore (Apr 20)
    - Re: TCP/BGP vulnerability - easier than you think Rob Thomas (Apr 20)

(Thread continues...)