nanog mailing list archives

RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit


From: "Gary Hale" <ghale () globalinternetworking com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:17:43 -0400


Daniel,

That is way too cynical ... and does not address the question of whether
building your own transport ever runs counter to the Internet as a
consortium. 

There are business justifications that underpin peering relationships
... and they are based on understanding (or ... "philosophy") ....

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Golding [mailto:dgolding () burtongroup com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:36 AM
To: Gary Hale; Michel Py; Gordon Cook; nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit

On 4/20/04 8:45 AM, "Gary Hale" <ghale () globalinternetworking com> wrote:


The question is too simplistic ... It is not (simply) a matter of
small
vs. big or being on your own network from source-to-destination.
Peering
is an enabler ... and gives all an opportunity to share content
globally
... kinda' fundamental to the Internet consortium.

Is your question, 'Since fiber is so cheap, why doesn't everyone build
an autonomous, facilities-based, global "Internet" network that
competes
for narrowband/broadband "pullers" of data and hosting/data
centers/etc.
for content providers ("pulled-fromers" or "pushers" of data)?

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Michel Py [mailto:michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:46 PM
To: Gordon Cook; nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: Backbone IP network Economics - peering and transit


Peering?  Who needs peering if transit can be
had for $20 per megabit per second?

The smaller guys that don't buy transit buy the gigabit.

Michel.



Gary,

"Peering is an enabler"
"gives all an opportunity to share content globally"
"fundamental to the Internet consortium"

This is like the "greatest hits" compendium collected from various
failed
1990's service provider business plans :)

People should be careful. Peering is a business/networking arrangement
that
can save them money (or not). Those who try to imbue it with
philosophical
significance must be viewed with skepticism.
 

Daniel Golding
Network and Telecommunications Strategies
Burton Group




Current thread: