nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS Insanity
From: Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:19:52 +1000
Jeremy Kister wrote:
Ok now I have settled into another night of fixing things... I see no mails from yourself in the ticketting system which indicate dynamic ranges - all seem to just demand delisting of all the blocking the /16 statin gthey are all static.... (I have not looked at tickets owned by the other SORBS staff)I became aware that just about all of 64.115.0.0/16 In this same email, I also stated: 1. exactly which 64.115 networks were dynamic
In your mail you indicated some of the rDNS is clear in that it indicates what address ranges are dynamic, and you also say above you have stated them - so I have removed the /16, now lets see a little help and give us this list, and I will then be able to list them.... otherwise I will have to go back to analysing the rDNS dump and guessing which are which again.
Yours Mat
Current thread:
- SORBS Insanity Jeremy Kister (Apr 14)
- Re: SORBS Insanity jlewis (Apr 14)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Jeff Kell (Apr 14)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Matthew Sullivan (Apr 15)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Joe Maimon (Apr 15)
- Re: SORBS Insanity jlewis (Apr 15)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Matthew Sullivan (Apr 15)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Matthew Sullivan (Apr 15)
- Re: SORBS Insanity Matthew Sullivan (Apr 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SORBS Insanity Matthew Sullivan (Apr 15)